Pitchfork

Many regard Bj\xF6rk's enduring past as evidence of genius at work, but in a Lutheran city with a population\n\ of 110,000 and no internal music industry to speak of, it's considerably easier to make waves in Reykjavik\n\ than in, say, New York City. Add to this a UK music press obsessed with novelty in the post-punk era, and\n\ you've got a microwave recipe for compartmentalization via xenophile adoration. Or, Enter The Pixie.

\n\n\ Bj\xF6rk was inextricably linked to that somewhat belittling moniker for more than a decade, treated as a\n\ misfit toy, adored for her wardrobe, demeanor and delivery, rather than the gripping lyrics and revolutionary\n\ music she composed. Composed, I should add, with a little help from her friends: as much as critics fawned\n\ over Bj\xF6rk, fellow musicians descended like praise harpies once she left The Sugarcubes, eager to prop up\n\ their own careers through her arresting beauty and shattering voice.

\n\n\ Few artists enjoy the kind of universal acclaim Bj\xF6rk has basked in since the beginning of her solo career.\n\ The press fawned over Bj\xF6rk's cutting edge productions, but most focused on her unique pipes; as her success\n\ exposed-- or, some would argue, created-- other Icelandic acts (Sigur R\xF3s, M\xFAm), her voice became increasingly\n\ familiar, a recognizable product of her environment. The result: the rest of the world has been immunized to\n\ the Icelandic cadence, and Bj\xF6rk is no longer supernatural. Though it's mostly in contrast to her defining\n\ Homogenic that her last full-length, Vespertine, shouldered a somewhat lukewarm reception, at\n\ last, we were able to focus on the music, which by its release in 2001, Bj\xF6rk had been ignoring for too long.\n\ To lift a quote regarding her latest single \"It's in Our Hands\" (included on Greatest Hits): \"It was\n\ nice to do a full-blooded song after doing a whole album that didn't have any blood in it.\"

\n\n\ She may not have had the blood to give: after Homogenic, Bj\xF6rk dove headfirst into distraction,\n\ starring in the critically lauded film Dancer in the Dark, for which she won Best Actress at the\n\ Cannes Film Festival (unbelievably, she was booed by much of the audience). The soundtrack, composed by\n\ committee, was a forgettable showtune restaging of Homogenic, largely ignored by critics and fans\n\ (though the latter class certainly embraced its opening and closing tracks). She had always played\n\ coat-hanger to chic designers, but took it to a whole new level at the Oscars, donning that infamously\n\ absurd, headline-grabbing swan dress to launch Vespertine in a questionable appropriation of her\n\ celebrity. She wears the dress on the album cover, but it wasn't shot until weeks after the ceremony.\n\ Given her untarnished history of independence, it's safe to assume the album's swan motif was determined\n\ well in advance of Marjan Pejoski's quack gown, but it's a load of nonsense Bj\xF6rk would rather put behind\n\ her. It's a perfect time to review the reason she has access to global media channels: her music.

\n\n\ An absolute tidal wave of Bj\xF6rk releases hit shelves this year: four concert DVDs, two singles (on CD and\n\ DVD), a book, a second compendium of her videos (Volumen 2), the endlessly delayed rarities box set\n\ Family Tree (featuring a pair of tracks from her days in the excellent new-wave punk band Kukl, who\n\ would evolve into The Sugarcubes), and this single-disc Greatest Hits, whose tracklist was determined\n\ by fans (Family Tree includes a hits disc of Bj\xF6rk's choosing). Oddly, it's the fans' disc that\n\ offers the best look back, stocked with both her catchiest and most dramatic work.

\n\n\ Bj\xF6rk's website offers voluminous, detailed and extremely juicy histories of each song on Greatest Hits.\n\ Discussing them here may well be pointless in lieu of all that data, and anyway, with a Greatest Hits\n\ package, it's the album itself that needs to serve a valuable purpose. We already know all the songs. The\n\ only questions here are why would fans buy it, and is it a worthwhile summary of her career?

\n\n\ Like many radio-friendly solo artists, Bj\xF6rk's albums house a modicum of filler. Hers less than most, but\n\ only a handful of great songs didn't make the cut for Greatest Hits. Of the singles she's released,\n\ only \"Violently Happy\", \"It's Oh So Quiet\" and \"I Miss You\" aren't included. A few stellar long-players\n\ like \"Headphones\" and \"The Anchor Song\" also fall by the wayside, but it may be worth whatever sacrifice\n\ for the bubbling keyboards and clicks behind her latest single \"It's in Our Hands\", and \"Play Dead\", a\n\ bellowing, early attempt at orchestra-backed pop written with Jah Wobble in 1993 (for a forgettable British\n\ gangster film).

\n\n\ With music as unique, affirming and joyous as Bj\xF6rk's, exploration is almost unnecessary; though some dares\n\ have worked wonders (see Funkst\xF6rung's genius remix of \"All Is Full of Love\"), in the end, many of her\n\ drawn-out album tracks aren't bad as much as comparatively boring. With so many glorious singles to her\n\ credit, the remainder of her catalog plays increasingly as afterthought: a Greatest Hits package has\n\ rarely made this much sense, and though a few classics are left out, there isn't much more to Bj\xF6rk than\n\ this.

"